<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reconsidering Google Sky</title>
	<atom:link href="http://astrogeek.us/2007/08/23/reconsidering-google-sky/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://astrogeek.us/2007/08/23/reconsidering-google-sky/</link>
	<description>Amateur astronomy through the eyes of a computer geek - Now with Full Frontal Nerdity!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 12:21:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://astrogeek.us/2007/08/23/reconsidering-google-sky/comment-page-1/#comment-338</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 01:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://astrogeek.wordpress.com/2007/08/23/reconsidering-google-sky/#comment-338</guid>
		<description>I agree. GS is &quot;fun&quot; but I&#039;ll stick with real planetarium and observing session software for doing serious things. Plus, I don&#039;t have internet way out in the sticks at my observatory. So no to GS out there, and yes to Starry Night, The Sky, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. GS is &#8220;fun&#8221; but I&#8217;ll stick with real planetarium and observing session software for doing serious things. Plus, I don&#8217;t have internet way out in the sticks at my observatory. So no to GS out there, and yes to Starry Night, The Sky, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
